- Berg, Kristine Syvertsen (2011). Love and Social Differences in Samuel Richardson’s Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded and Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre. Department of Literature, University of Oslo https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/25304/Bergx-xmaster.pdf?sequence=1
- Black & Gregory (1991). Culture, Politics and Society in Britain, 1660-1800. Manchester University .
- Luebering, J. E. (2010). English Literature from the Restoration Through the Romantic Period. The Rosen Publishing Group
- National Cyclopaedia. (1884). The national encyclopædia. Libr. ed.
- Richardson, Samuel (1740). Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded. Project Gutenberg. E-Book released on April 23, 2009. www.gutenberg.org/files/6124/6124-h/6124-h.htm
- T. Nelson & son. (1890). Lives of English Authors: A Biographical History of English Literature.
jueves, 27 de noviembre de 2014
Pamela or Virtue... Reexamined
martes, 25 de noviembre de 2014
Francis Bacon's Essayism
- Personal life: 12 years: Trinity College. Travel to France.
- Science: Lead the Scientific revolution. He's the “Father of modern scientific method”—Baconian method - idols of human mind. “Father of deductive reasoning” . Reform in science. Simplex to complex. Against empirical scientism (he recognized the Limits of scientific knowledge).Against speculative science VS Empirical science.
- Politics: Laws in Cambridge. Statesman. 8 times in the Parlament. Orator . Lawyer Jurist / Judge. Bribes. Imprisonment. Reform of English law—legal works. Different charges during Queen Elizabeth and King James. -Many enemies
- Philosophy: Empirism. “Father of Empirism”. Against mere rationalism. Moral philosophy. A moralist because he preached morality and virtue. “Founder of modern philosophy”
- Religion: Christian philosopher. Morals. Against atheism. Against superstition. Reivindication of Protestantism. Translated Psalms from the Bible into English., “Theological tracts” – collection of prayers.
- Literature: Father of English Essayism. Knew latin and greek. Shared the wisdom of his life.. The first works in English that described themselves as essays. New Atlantis (1624)– Utopian novel- ideal university, Solomon’s House no immorality
- Works: Essays (1597) 10 treatises. Essays (1612) 38 treatises. Essays (1625) 58 treatises. Of the proficience and advancement of learning, divine and human (1605). Science and religion and its relationship. Novum Organum (1620)
Essays in relation
to
the physical world and social /public life |
Essays in relation
to
individual private life and integrity towards others |
Essays in relation
to the spiritual world –morals- religion and God
|
Of Seditions and Troubles
Of Great Place, Of Discourse, Of Judicature, Of Suitors, Of Gardens |
Of Parents and Children, Of Marriage , Of Envy,
Of Love, Of Travel, Of Friendship, Of Health, Of Custom and Education, Of Followers and Friends, Of Studies, Of Ceremonies and Respects, Of Honor and Reputation, Of Fame |
Of Death, Of Goodness and Goodness of Nature, Of Atheism, Of
Superstition, Of Wisdom for a Man’s Self, Of Nature in Men, Of Unity in
Religion, Of Truth
|
People show who they really are when they face difficult times
Get out the best out of you
Make beauty out of ashes
Duality in Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream
by the triple Hecate's team
from the presence of the sun,
following darkness like a dream..."
In this essay, I will talk about how duality and antithetical elements are portrayed in Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream. This work is believed to have been first performed between 1595 or 1596; it is said that it was written for the celebration of a wedding (Taylor: 1973:221), and it is known that it was first published in the late 1600 (Holland, 1998:110), an epoch which, according to Jacobson (2004:7), was “a highly creative period” in Shakespeare’s career.
- Bristol, Michael D. (2011). Shakespeare and Moral Agency. Continuum Shakespeare Studies. New York. A&C Black. ISBN: 9781441120472
- Driver, Martha W.; Sid Ray. Shakespeare and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Performance and Adaptation of the Plays with Medieval Sources or Setting. McFarland
- Halliwell, James Orchard (1841). An introduction to Shakespeare's Midsummer nitgth's dream by James Orchard Halliwell. London. Will. Pickering.
- Holland, Peter (1998). The Oxford Shakespeare: A Midsummer Night's Dream. The World's Classics.
- Lawler, Traugott; (1980). The one and the many in the Canterbury tales. Archon Books.a
- Leipsic, E. Fleischer, (1833). The beauties of Shakespeare, selected from his plays and poems. 6th ed. London.
- Montangu, Elizabeth (1770). An Essay on the Writings and Genius of Shakespear:. London. J. and H Hughs.
- Shakespeare, William. A Midsummer Night's Dream. 10th edition. Collins Edition. The Project Gutenberg. (2003). Accessed: August 2014 http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext98/2ws1710h.htm
- Shmoop. 2014. A Midsummer Night's Dream > The Challenging. Accessed: August 2014 http://www.shmoop.com/midsummer-nights-dream/changeling.html
- Taylor, Marion Ansel (1973). Bottom, Thou Art Translated: Political Allegory in A Midsummer Night's Dream and Related Literature. Rodopi.
- Vickers, Brian (2003). William Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage Volume 6 (1774-1801). Routledge.
Robinson Crusoe: Novel VS. Movie
Daniel Defoe’s novel (1719)
|
1997 movie
|
Robinson is enslaved for 24
years (Ch. II).
|
Robinson is never
enslaved.
|
Robinson experiences a
religious conversion, a vision dream in which he is told to repent.
|
Robinson does not
experience a conversion whatsoever.
|
Friday escapes and
Robinson shoots his persecutors, injuring one and resultantly killing the other.
Friday kills the injured native.
|
Robinson kills the
natives with a gun and only then can Friday escape.
|
Friday willingly vows in
gratitude to Robinson.
|
Friday is forcibly
chained by Robinson.
|
Robinson takes Friday as
a servant.
|
Robinson takes Friday as
a slave.
|
Robinson’s attitude
toward Friday is loving, monitored and fatherly (Ch. XIV). Friday is loyal to
him.
|
Robinson’s attitude
towards Friday is first rude, irritate, and harsh. Friday leaves him because
of it.
|
As Robinson instructs Friday “in the knowledge of the true God”, the native shows himself
cheerful and deeply interested. He “listened
with great attention, and received with pleasure the notion of Jesus Christ
being sent to redeem us” (Ch. XV).
|
Robinson fanatically and
intolerably preaches to Friday about the Creator. Friday seems rather puzzled
and confused by Robinson’s preaching, and he informs from the beginning that
he dislikes Robinson’s religion.
|
Friday concludes the
Christian God must be “a greater God
than their Benamuckee”, since pagan priests say the cannibal’s god is not
supposed to listen in the ground unless they climb to the mountain.
Nature assists Robinson’s
arguments to evidence to Friday “the
necessity of a great First Cause” (Ch. XV).
|
Friday reacts negatively
to Robinson’s idea of God and he conclusively states “I don’t like your God.”
He informs he prefers the cannibal’s pagan crocodile god who is said to hear cannibals even in the trees and in the water. |
Friday becomes a Christian
and ends up accepting Robinson’s lifestyle. Robinson comments: “this savage was now a good Christian, a
much better than I” (Ch. XVI).
|
Robinson ends up
accepting Friday’s cultural lifestyle and somehow forsakes his Christianity.
|
Robinson ponders whether
killing natives goes against the principles of his religion. Friday tries to
convince Robinson to Christianize and civilize other cannibals in the island,
asking him to “teach wild mans be good…
tell them know God, pray God, and live new life” (Ch. XVI). Friday shows
himself enthusiastic about it.
They both end up in
England.
|
Robinson and Friday go
against the enemy cannibal tribe. Robinson fanatically appears to believe himself to be superior, he becomes a
Lord, a swordman and kind of a warrior against natives. He also fights Friday
and, at the end, Friday is murdered on the island.
|
“The writing of history reflects the interests, predilections, and even prejudices of a given generation” said John Hope Franklin, and the writing of this story is not the exception. In the space and time in which Defoe lived, Christianity was more favored and was generally viewed with more public sympathy, whereas today, it is approached with contempt by many circles in mainstream media.
As it can be seen, the movie version here discussed greatly misrepresents the original story especially in what concerns to the role of religion: it disfavors what Defoe wanted to favour, and replaces his religious sentiment with elements adverse to it, turning a justification of “the Wisdom of Providence in all the Variety of our Circumstances”, into an attack against it.
The role of religion in Robinson Crusoe
This is why, a number of authors have interpreted it as a spiritual biography (Starr, 1965) or, like Juan Antonio Ortega y Medina, as a Puritan allegory in which “God's hands are manifested everywhere; providential and mysterious decrees operating all around, urging Robinson to undertake his duties and letting each action being properly judged and rewarded if applicable” (1976:6).
- Books, LLC, (2010). English Presbyterians:. General Books LLC
- Carey, Daniel, Festa Lynn (2009). The Postcolonial Enlightenment : Eighteenth-Century Colonialism and Postcolonial Theory. Oxford University Press.
- Chapman, J. (1892). The Westminster Review, Volume 138.
- Defoe, Daniel. (1815). Crusoe, written by himsel. Oxford University.
- Defoe, Daniel. (1720). Serious Reflections During the Life and Surprising Adventures of Robinson Crusoe With his Vision of the Angelic World. W. Taylor.
- Defoe, Daniel; Ed. by Davis, Evan (2010). Robinson Crusoe. Broadview Press.
- Defoe, Daniel; Ed. by Hazlitt, William (1840). The Works of Daniel Defoe: With a Memoir of His Life and Writings. Volume 1. J. Clements,
- Defoe, Daniel. Ed. by Prince, David. (1996). The Life and Adventures of Robinson Crusoe. London. Seeley, Service & Co. Limited. Access date: September 2014. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/521/521-h/521-h.htm
- Defoe, Daniel; Ed. by Roberts, Doreen (1995). Robinson Crusoe. Wordsworth Editions.
- Defoe, Daniel; Ed. by Grandville. The life and adventures of Robinson Crusoe: With a memoir of the author. Willoughby
- Josbd.com (2013). Robinson Crusoe is a religious or spiritual allegory.
- Access date: September (2014): http://josbd.com/robinson_crusoe.html
- Hunter, J. Paul. (1966). The reluctant pilgrim: Defoe's emblematic method and quest for form in Robinson Crusoe. Johns Hopkins Press.
- Infinity Plus One. (2004). Does Robinson Crusoe Improve as a Person?. Fiction Press. Acces: September 2014
- https://www.fictionpress.com/s/1769850/1/Does-Robinson-Crusoe-Improve-as-a-Person
- Maximillian E. Novak. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology. Vol. 67, No. 1 (Jan. 1968). Access date: September 2014
- http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/27705499?uid=3738664&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104717122113
- Ortega y Medina, Juan Antonio (1976). Discurso de Recepción. Academia Mexicana de la Historia. Access date: September 2014
- http://www.acadmexhistoria.org.mx/pdfs/discursos/SILLON_11_ORTEGA_MEDINA.pdf
- Owens, W.R. (2009). London: Pickering & Chatto. The Novels of Daniel Defoe. London. Pickering & Chatto
- Shmoop University (2014). Robinson Crusoe: Themes: Religion. Access date: September 2014
- http://www.shmoop.com/robinson-crusoe/religion-theme.html
- Starr, George A. (1965). Defoe & Spiritual Autobiography. Gordian Press, Inc. Princeton University Press
- Stocks, Tiphanie N. (2002). Daniel Defoe and the Reform of the English Nation: An Examination of His Moralistic Writings. ProQuest. ISBN 9780549726012
- Todd, Dennis; Wall, J., Cynthia; Hunterm, Paul. (2001). Eighteenth-century Genre and Culture. University of Delaware Press.
Appendix
Many modern retellings of Robinson Crusoe have taken some religious aspects away, and added some contrary elements instead. This appendix takes as an example the 1997 film version of the story. If we only compare this contemporary remaking to Defoe’s original book, we see these major differences that alter the meaning of the story and completely change the approach towards religion in general, and Christianity in particular.
Daniel Defoe’s novel (1719) | 1997 movie |
Robinson is enslaved for 24 years (Ch. II). | Robinson is never enslaved. |
Robinson experiences a religious conversion, a vision dream in which he is told to repent. | Robinson does not experience a conversion whatsoever. |
Friday escapes and Robinson shoots his persecutors, injuring one and resultantly killing the other. Friday kills the injured native. | Robinson kills the natives with a gun and only then can Friday escape. |
Friday willingly vows in gratitude to Robinson. | Friday is forcibly chained by Robinson. |
Robinson takes Friday as a servant. | Robinson takes Friday as a slave. |
Robinson’s attitude toward Friday is loving, monitored and fatherly (Ch. XIV). Friday is loyal to him. | Robinson’s attitude towards Friday is first rude, irritate, and harsh. Friday leaves him because of it. |
As Robinson instructs Friday “in the knowledge of the true God”, the native shows himself cheerful and deeply interested. He “listened with great attention, and received with pleasure the notion of Jesus Christ being sent to redeem us” (Ch. XV). | Robinson fanatically and intolerably preaches to Friday about the Creator. Friday seems rather puzzled and confused by Robinson’s preaching, and he informs from the beginning that he dislikes Robinson’s religion. |
Friday concludes the Christian God must be “a greater God than their Benamuckee”, since pagan priests say the cannibal’s god is not supposed to listen in the ground unless they climb to the mountain. Nature assists Robinson’s arguments to evidence to Friday “the necessity of a great First Cause” (Ch. XV). | Friday reacts negatively to Robinson’s idea of God and he conclusively states “I don’t like your God.” |
Friday becomes a Christian and ends up accepting Robinson’s lifestyle. Robinson comments: “this savage was now a good Christian, a much better than I” (Ch. XVI). | Robinson ends up accepting Friday’s cultural lifestyle and somehow forsakes his Christianity. |
Robinson ponders whether killing natives goes against the principles of his religion. Friday tries to convince Robinson to Christianize and civilize other cannibals in the island, asking him to “teach wild mans be good… tell them know God, pray God, and live new life” (Ch. XVI). Friday shows himself enthusiastic about it. They both end up in England. | Robinson and Friday go against the enemy cannibal tribe. Robinson fanatically appears to believe himself to be superior, he becomes a Lord, a swordman and kind of a warrior against natives. He also fights Friday and, at the end, Friday is murdered on the island. |
“The writing of history reflects the interests, predilections, and even prejudices of a given generation” said John Hope Franklin, and the writing of this story is not the exception. In the space and time in which Defoe lived, Christianity was more favored and was generally viewed with more public sympathy, whereas today, it is approached with contempt by many circles in mainstream media. This movie version greatly misrepresents the original story especially in what concerns to the role of religion: it disfavors what Defoe wanted to favour, and replaces his religious sentiment with elements adverse to it, turning a justification of “the Wisdom of Providence in all the Variety of our Circumstances”, into an attack against it.